??? Since the philosopher probably would not accept that rule as a universal
moral rule, the Kantian would conclude that one should not waste printer paper.
The utilitarian positions are consequentialist positions, because they evaluate the consequences of a decision
to decide whether it is good or bad. An act or a rule is good if it generates more total good for all concerned.
In considering the question of wasting printer paper, the utilitarian would ask what the cost of the paper is, and
what the benefits of wasting the paper might be. A complete analysis would include the environmental impact
of the waste as well as the values of such things as time saved, clear separation of print jobs, etc.
Finally, social contract theory says that rules are moral when rational people will agree to accept them, on
the condition that others do likewise. With respect to the question of wasting paper, the people concerned must
discuss the issue. If all agree to be bound by the rule not to waste paper, then wasting paper will be bad and not
wasting paper will be good.
Different ethical theories can lead to different decisions with respect to what is right or wrong. For
instance, a Kantian might conclude that copying a copyrighted CD is wrong, while a utilitarian might
169
reach a different conclusion, at least in some circumstances (and notwithstanding that breaking the law is
itself a problem!).
Pages:
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459